 |
 |
Segmentation of volume images, e.g., CT and MR images, is a common
clinical procedure required for defining normal anatomical structures
and tumor volumes for 3D radiation therapy treatment planning
(3D RTP). Current user-guided methods are inefficient and exhibit
significant inter-and intra-user variability. Improvements in
efficiency can reduce costs and possibly facilitate new technologies
for target localization and patient positioning immediately prior to
each treatment fraction and for online verification of treatment
geometry using electronic portal images. Improved accuracy and
precision is clinically important in many cases, particularly when
the risk of morbidity is a significant factor in treatment planning
decisions, and for clinical trials that collect dose-volume data that
will be factored into determination of probabilities for tumor
control and normal tissue complications. We are in the early stages
of an evaluation of the accuracy, reproducibility, robustness and
sensitivity of M-rep segmentation for selected normal structures
important in 3D RTP. Our general procedure is to build and train
M-rep models of anatomical objects, apply the models to target images
for which truth is defined, and measure the goodness of match between
the deformed models and truth. Target images are samples from a
disribution derived from a labeled reference image by applying warp
fields that map original intensity values to new locations. The warp
fields change the shapes of objects in the reference image in a way
that mimics normal shape variations. Noise and other image
disturbances will be added to target images in a graded manner to
test robustness and sensitivity. Image parameters to be investigated
include modality, slice thickness, contrast vs non contrast, and MR
pulse sequence. M-rep characteristics to be investigated include
model builder preferences (e.g., different model building decisions
that result in structurally distinct models); medial atom density
and spacing; atom-level choices for image sampling filters;
hybrid models (e.g., models including landmarks or parts of multiple
objects); and linked M-reps for multiple objects (local atlases).
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Mills PH, Fuchs H, Pizer SM, Rosenman JG,
IMEX: A tool for image display and contour management in a
windowing environment. Medical Imaging III: Image Capture and
Display, RH Schneider, S Dwyer II, and RG Jost, eds,
Proceedings of the SPIE 1091:132-142, 1989
Chaney E and Pizer S,
Defining Anatomical Structures from Medical Images,
Seminars in Radiation Oncology 2(4):215-225 (1992)
Tracton G, Chaney EL, Rosenman JG, Pizer SM,
MASK: Combining 2D and 3D Segmentation Methods to Enhance
Functionality, Math. Methods Med. Imaging III, F.L. Bookstein
et al eds, SPIE Proc. Volume 2299: 98-109 (1994)
McAuliffe MJ, Eberly D, Fritsch DS, Chaney EL, and Pizer SM:
Scale-Space Boundary Evolution Initialized by Cores.
Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Visualization
in Biomedical Computing, Lecture Notes in Comp Sci Vol 1131,
KH Hohne and R Kikinis (eds), Springer: 173-182 (1996)
Fritsch DS, Pizer SM, Yu L, Johnson V, and Chaney EL:
Segmentation of Medical Image Objects using Deformable Shape Loci,
Proc. Info. Processing in Med. Imaging (IPMI),
Lecture Notes in Computer Science, J Duncan and G Gindi, eds,
Springer-Verlag, Berlin: 127-140 (1997)
Chaney EL, Fritsch DS, Pizer S, Objective GTV and Normal Structure
Segmentation, Imaging in Radiotherapy, A. Boyer and J. Hazle, eds.,
Advanced Medical Publishing, Madison, WI: 271-290 (1998)
Pizer SM, Fritsch DS, Yushkevich PA, Johnson VE, and Chaney EL:
Segmentation, Registration, and Measurement of Shape Variation via
Image Object Shape, Transactions in Medical Imaging 18(10):
851-865 (1999)
|
 |
 |